Storylines of family medicine I: framing family medicine - history, values and perspectives.

Storylines of Family Medicine is a 12-part series of thematically linked mini-essays with accompanying illustrations that explore the many dimensions of family medicine, as interpreted by individual family physicians and medical educators in the USA and elsewhere around the world. In 'I: framing family medicine-history, values, and perspectives', the authors address the following themes: 'Notes on Storylines of Family Medicine', 'Family medicine-the generalist specialty', 'Family medicine's achievements-a glass half full assessment', 'Family medicine's next 50 years-toward filling our glasses', 'Four enduring truths of family medicine', 'Names matter', 'Family medicine at its core' and 'The ecology of medical care.' May readers find much food for thought in these essays.

[Family and community medicine: The most chosen specialty in the MIR]. / Medicina familiar y comunitaria: la especialidad más elegida en el MIR.

Family and Community Medicine is the most offered and chosen specialty in the MIR (Spanish medical residency examination), however, every year its attractiveness is questioned due to not all offered positions being filled and a certain number of resident doctors deciding not to continue in this specialty once started. In this context, some of the proposals to address the problem focus on increasing the supply when the facts show that the challenge lies in addressing the demand by making the specialty and its professional scope more attractive. The problem and its determinants are analyzed in this context by focusing on four elements that may be influencing it: the vocational aspects of medical graduates who pursue specialization, the characteristics of the specialty program and the teaching units where training is carried out, the presence of family medicine in the university as a key element for knowledge and affinity to this specialty from undergraduate studies, and finally, the situation of primary care as the space where training is materialized and the priority setting for the professional practice of future specialists.

Using ChatGPT in family medicine and primary health care.

No abstarct available.

Family practice research in the African region 2020-2022.

BACKGROUND:  The African region produces a small proportion of all health research, including primary health care research. The SCOPUS database only lists the African Journal of Primary Health Care Family Medicine (PHCFM) and the South African Family Practice Journal (SAFP) in the field of family practice. AIM:  To review the nature of all original research (2020-2022) published in PHCFM and SAFP. SETTING:  African region. METHOD:  All 327 articles were included. Data were extracted into REDCap, using a standardised tool and exported to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. RESULTS:  The median number of authors was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-4) and institutions and disciplines 1 (IQR: 1-2). Most authors were from South Africa (79.8%) and family medicine (45.3%) or public health (34.2%). Research focused on integrated health services (76.1%) and was mostly clinical (66.1%) or service delivery (37.9%). Clinical research addressed infectious diseases (23.4%), non-communicable diseases (24.6%) and maternal and women's health (19.4%). Service delivery research addressed the core functions of primary care (35.8%), particularly person-centredness and comprehensiveness. Research targeted adults and older adults (77.0%) as well as health promotion or disease prevention (38.5%) and treatment (30.9%). Almost all research was descriptive (73.7%), mostly surveys. CONCLUSION:  Future research should include community empowerment and multisectoral action. Within integrated health services, some areas need more attention, for example, children, palliative and rehabilitative care, continuity and coordination. Capacity building and support should enable larger, less-descriptive and more collaborative interdisciplinary studies with authors outside of South Africa.Contribution: The results highlight the strengths and weaknesses of family practice research in Africa.

Addressing hepatitis delta in primary care practices in the US: a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: Infection with the hepatitis delta virus (HDV), a unique RNA virus that requires hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigens for its assembly, replication, and transmission, causes severe viral hepatitis. Compared to HBV monoinfection, HDV infection increases the risk of severe liver disease, necessity for liver transplant, and mortality. Global HDV prevalence estimates vary from 5% to 15% among persons with HBV, but screening guidelines for HDV are inconsistent; some recommend risk-based screening, while others recommend universal screening for all people with HBV. Among primary care providers (PCPs) in the US, there is a lack of awareness and/or insufficient adherence to current recommendations for the screening of HDV infection and management of chronic HDV. METHODS: Publications were obtained by conducting literature searches between July and August 2022 using the PubMed database and by manual searches of the retrieved literature for additional references. Information was synthesized to highlight HDV screening and management strategies for PCPs. Best practices for PCPs based on current guidelines and comanagement strategies for patients with HBV and HDV infection were summarized. RESULTS: We recommend universal screening for HDV in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen. Confirmed HDV infection should prompt evaluation by a liver specialist, if available, with whom the PCP can comanage the patient. PCPs should counsel patients on the expected course of the disease, lifestyle factors that may influence liver health, need for consistent disease monitoring and follow-up, and risk of disease transmission. Screening is suggested for sexual partners, household contacts, and family members, with HBV immunization recommended for those found to be susceptible. There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for HDV infection; thus, management is limited to treatments for chronic HBV infection plus long-term monitoring of liver health. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs can be a valuable point of care for patients to access HDV/HBV screening, HBV immunization, and education, and can comanage patients with HBV and/or HDV infection.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection only occurs in the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. People with an HDV infection are at higher risk for severe liver disease, liver transplant, and death compared to those who only have an HBV infection. The estimated global prevalence of HDV infection ranges from 5% to 15% among people living with HBV. These measurements vary due to different study methods, inconsistent HDV screening guidelines, and patient risk factors for infection.In the US, primary care providers (PCPs) play an important role in improving community access to HDV information and testing. However, poor funding and inadequate resources have created a lack of awareness and insufficient adherence by PCPs to current recommendations for screening and management of HDV infection. This narrative review aims to fill this gap by providing an overview of HDV infection, patient risk factors, and practice guidelines for PCPs.The recommendations for PCPs in this review include providing universal screening for HDV to people with an HBV infection, especially those at high risk. PCPs can educate and comanage patients with liver specialists. Topics to discuss with patients include expected disease outcomes, lifestyle factors that may influence liver health, and the need for consistent follow-up appointments. Patient risk of disease transmission can also be discussed to identify sexual partners, household contacts, and family members who will need screening and HBV vaccination. While there are no FDA-approved therapies for treating HDV infection, we provide an overview of available and emerging HDV treatments.

Sleep disturbance in people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a realist review of general practice.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is a prevalent condition among people living with dementia (PLwD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Its assessment and management within primary care is complex because of the comorbidities, older age, and cognitive impairment typical of this patient group. AIM: To explore how primary care clinicians assess, understand, and manage sleep disturbance for PLwD or MCI; if and why such initiatives work; and how people and their carers experience sleep disturbance and its treatment. DESIGN AND SETTING: A realist review of existing literature conducted in 2022. METHOD: Six bibliographic databases were searched. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) were developed and refined. RESULTS: In total, 60 records were included from 1869 retrieved hits and 19 CMOCs were developed. Low awareness of and confidence in the treatment of sleep disturbance among primary care clinicians and patients, combined with time and resource constraints, meant that identifying sleep disturbance was difficult and not prioritised. Medication was perceived by clinicians and patients as the primary management tool, resulting in inappropriate or long-term prescription. Rigid nursing routines in care homes were reportedly not conducive to good-quality sleep. CONCLUSION: In primary care, sleep disturbance among PLwD or MCI is not adequately addressed. Over-reliance on medication, underutilisation of non-pharmacological strategies, and inflexible care home routines were reported as a result of low confidence in sleep management and resource constraints. This does not constitute effective and person-centred care. Future work should consider ways to tailor the assessment and management of sleep disturbance to the needs of individuals and their informal carers without overstretching services.

Adjudications and tinkering with care for socially vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the mechanisms at play in the adjudications made by professionals and socially vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes about their eligibility for care. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The study included 14 patients and 10 health professionals in seven general practice surgeries in deprived areas in Greater Copenhagen. The study data consist of 17 semi-structured interviews with patients and 22 with health professionals immediately after observation of 23 consultations. Our analytical approach was inspired by Systematic Text Condensation and the concept of 'candidacy' for access to health care. RESULTS: Adjudications of patients not being candidates for services were common, but we also found that both patients and health professionals worked to align the services to the needs of the patients. This could include using services differently than was intended by the providers or by changing routines to make it easier for patients to use the services. We discuss these processes as 'tinkering'. This usually implies that the best individual solution for the patient is aimed for, and in this study, the best solution sometimes meant not focusing on diabetes. CONCLUSION: The study adds to existing knowledge about access to services for socially vulnerable patients by demonstrating that both patients and professionals in general practice engage in tinkering processes to make services work.

Unequal use and benefits of health services play a significant role in relation to social inequality in healthFlexibility in services and alternatives to school-like rehabilitation are needed to reduce inequality in access to health carePatients were sometimes judged as unsuitable for available routine services, but professionals 'tinkered' with services to make them fitAdaptation of services by professionals in general practice implies a longer time frame for obtaining goals.

Education to improve timeliness of shingles diagnosis: Cluster RCT and qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (shingles) is normally diagnosed clinically. Timely diagnosis is important so antiviral treatment can be started soon after rash onset. AIM: To assess whether a practice-level educational intervention, aimed at non-clinical patient-facing staff, improves the timely assessment of patients with shingles. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cluster randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT) with nested qualitative study in General Practices in England. METHODS: Practices were cluster randomised 1:1, stratified by centre and minimised by practice list size and index of multiple deprivation score. Intervention practices were sent educational materials, highlighting the common presenting features of shingles and what action to take if suspected. The primary and secondary outcomes were the mean proportion of patients per practice seen within 72 hours and 144 of rash onset, respectively. Comparison between groups was conducted using linear regression, adjusting for randomisation variables. Semi-structured interviews with practice staff in intervention practices explored views and opinions of the intervention. RESULTS: 67 practices were enrolled; 34 randomised to intervention, 33 to control. The mean difference in proportion of patients seen within 72 and 144 hours was -0.132 (95% CI -0.308, 0.043) and -0.039 (95% CI -0.158, 0.080), respectively. In intervention practices, 90.5% reported distributing the educational materials, however engagement with these was suboptimal. 12 participants were interviewed, and the poster component of the intervention was said to be easiest to implement. CONCLUSION: Our educational intervention did not improve the timely assessment of patients with shingles. This may be the result of poor intervention engagement.

Sex matters in the association between cardiovascular health and incident dementia: evidence from real world data.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular health has been associated with dementia onset, but little is known about the variation of such association by sex and age considering dementia subtypes. We assessed the role of sex and age in the association between cardiovascular risk and the onset of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia in people aged 50-74 years. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study covering 922.973 Catalans who attended the primary care services of the Catalan Health Institute (Spain). Data were obtained from the System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP database). Exposure was the cardiovascular risk (CVR) at baseline categorized into four levels of Framingham-REGICOR score (FRS): low (FRS < 5%), low-intermediate (5% ≤ FRS < 7.5%), high-intermediate (7.5% ≤ FRS < 10%), high (FRS ≥ 10%), and one group with previous vascular disease. Cases of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease were identified using validated algorithms, and cases of vascular dementia were identified by diagnostic codes. We fitted stratified Cox models using age parametrized as b-Spline. RESULTS: A total of 51,454 incident cases of all-cause dementia were recorded over a mean follow-up of 12.7 years. The hazard ratios in the low-intermediate and high FRS groups were 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.15) and 1.55 (1.50-1.60) for all-cause dementia; 1.07 (1.03-1.11) and 1.17 (1.11-1.24) for Alzheimer's disease; and 1.34 (1.21-1.50) and 1.90 (1.67-2.16) for vascular dementia. These associations were stronger in women and in midlife compared to later life in all dementia types. Women with a high Framingham-REGICOR score presented a similar risk of developing dementia - of any type - to women who had previous vascular disease, and at age 50-55, they showed three times higher risk of developing dementia risk compared to the lowest Framingham-REGICOR group. CONCLUSIONS: We found a dose‒response association between the Framingham-REGICOR score and the onset of all dementia types. Poor cardiovascular health in midlife increased the onset of all dementia types later in life, especially in women.

[Choice of Family and Community Medicine in the MIR 2002-2023: An objective approach shows that it is as highly valued as hospital specialties]. / Elección de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria en el MIR 2002-2023: un enfoque objetivo muestra que es una especialidad tan valorada como las hospitalarias.

INTRODUCTION: Currently there is a shortage of general practitioners (GP), and this is expected to increase in the coming years. Despite this need, it is a specialty that is supposedly little demanded, leaving specialized training places unfilled in recent years. The purpose of this study is to present new parameters to more objectively measure the demand and the relationship between supply and demand. METHODS: A database was used with the results of the places assigned in the MIR calls from 2002 to 2023. The calculated parameters were quoting index (CI), quote order, the order of top demand and the order of total demand of the GP specialty. The software R version 4.3.02 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The specialty quotation and top demand have remained constant during the study period, while there has been a slight and progressive worsening of the total demand. Nevertheless, the total demand for Family Medicine in the last call for MIR exam was higher than that for specialties such as urology, neurology, ENT, endocrinology, oncology, intensive care medicine or neurosurgery, among others. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the subjective perception of the worsening attractiveness Family Medicine in the last MIR calls, using objective parameters, we found that the attractiveness of the specialty, measured as quotation (supply/demand ratio) and demand, has remained stable (with a slight worsening of total demand).

Prevalence and associations of provision of nursing home visits and home visits by early-career specialist general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To establish prevalence and associations of provision of nursing home visits (NHV) and home visits (HV) by early-career specialist GPs. Of particular interest were associations of rurality with performing NHVs and HVs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study. DESIGN: A questionnaire-based study. SETTING: Australian general practice. PARTICIPANTS: Early-career specialist GPs, practising in Australia, who attained Fellowship between January 2016 and July 2018, inclusive, having completed GP training in NSW, the ACT, Eastern Victoria or Tasmania. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current provision of NHV and HV. RESULTS: NHV were provided by 34% of participants (59% in rural areas) and HV by 41% of participants (60% in rural areas). Remote, rural or regional practice location, as compared to major-city practice, was strongly associated with performing NHV as an early-career specialist GP; multivariable OR 5.87 (95% CI: 2.73, 12.6), p < 0.001, and with the provision of HV; multivariable OR 3.64 (95% CI: 1.63, 8.11), p = 0.002. Rurality of GP training (prior to attaining Fellowship) was significantly univariably associated with providing NHV and with providing HV as an early-career specialist GP. On multivariable analyses, these were no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Early-career specialist GPs located in regional/remote areas are more likely than their urban colleagues to provide NHV and HV.

Prediction of general practice licensure/certification examination performance by a measure of 'questionable' activities in clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: 'Low-value' clinical care and medical services are 'questionable' activities, being more likely to cause harm than good or with disproportionately low benefit relative to cost. This study examined the predictive ability of the QUestionable In Training Clinical Activities Index (QUIT-CAI) for general practice (GP) registrars' (trainees') performance in Australian GP Fellowship examinations (licensure/certification examinations for independent GP). METHODS: The study was nested in ReCEnT, an ongoing cohort study in which Australian GP registrars document their in-consultation clinical practice. Outcome factors in analyses were individual registrars' scores on the three Fellowship examinations ('AKT', 'KFP', and 'OSCE' examinations) and pass/fail rates during 2012-21. Analyses used univariable and multivariable regression (linear or logistic, as appropriate). The study factor in each analysis was 'QUIT-CAI score percentage'-the percentage of times a registrar performed a QUIT-CAI clinical activity when 'at risk' (i.e. when managing a problem where performing a QUIT-CAI activity was a plausible option). RESULTS: A total of 1265, 1145, and 553 registrars sat Applied Knowledge Test, Key Features Problem, and Objective Structured Clinical Exam examinations, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher QUIT-CAI score percentages (more questionable activities) were significantly associated with poorer Applied Knowledge Test scores (P = .001), poorer Key Features Problem scores (P = .003), and poorer Objective Structured Clinical Exam scores (P = .005). QUIT-CAI score percentages predicted Royal Australian College of General Practitioner exam failure [odds ratio 1.06 (95% CI 1.00, 1.12) per 1% increase in QUIT-CAI, P = .043]. CONCLUSION: Performing questionable clinical activities predicted poorer performance in the summative Fellowship examinations, thereby validating these examinations as measures of actual clinical performance (by our measure of clinical performance, which is relevant for a licensure/certification examination).

Primary care consultation patterns prior to suicide: a nationally representative case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Consultation with primary health care may provide an opportunity to identify patients at higher suicide risk. AIMS: To explore primary care consultation patterns in the 5 years before suicide to identify suicide high-risk groups and common reasons for consulting. DESIGN: A case-control study in England from 2001 to 2019 using electronic health records. METHOD: Analysis of 14515 patients aged ≥15 who died by suicide and up to 40 matched live controls per case (N=594674). RESULTS: Frequent consultations (>once per month in the final year) were associated with increased suicide risk (age and sex adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.88; 95% CI: 5.47-6.32). The associated rise in suicide risk was seen across all sociodemographic groups as well as in those with and without psychiatric comorbidities. However, specific groups were more influenced by the effect of high-frequency consultation (>once per month in the final year) demonstrating higher suicide risk compared to their counterparts who consulted once: females (adjusted OR 9.50; 95% CI: 7.82-11.54); patients aged 15 to 45 (adjusted OR 8.08; 95% CI: 7.29-8.96); patients experiencing less socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 6.56; 95% CI: 5.77-7.46); and those with psychiatric conditions (adjusted OR 4.57;95% CI: 4.12 to 5.06). Medication review, depression and pain were the commonest reasons for which suicide decedents consulted in the year before death. CONCLUSION: Escalating, or more than monthly consultations are associated with increased suicide risk regardless of patients' sociodemographic characteristics and regardless of the presence (or absence) of known psychiatric illnesses.

Barreras y facilitadores para el uso de las guías de práctica clínica por residentes de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria: estudio cualitativo con grupos focales / Barriers and facilitators for the use of clinical practice guidelines by Family and Community Medicine residents: qualitative study with focus groups

Objetivo: identificar barreras y facilitadores para el uso de las guías de práctica clínica (GPC) por residentes de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria.Métodos: metodología cualitativa. Se formaron tres grupos focales, total 28 residentes de tercer y cuarto año de las siete unidades docentes multiprofesionales de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria de Madrid. Los temas explorados fueron: conocimiento, comprensión, utilidad y uso de GPC. Las categorías elegidas para agrupar el discurso se elaboraron siguiendo el Manual metodológico de GuíaSalud. Análisis sociológico bajo la perspectiva fenomenológica.Resultados: las barreras relacionadas con la formación fueron el modelo de formación recibida para adquirir las habilidades necesarias, la falta de conocimientos para evaluar la calidad de las guías y un limitado conocimiento de los buscadores. Entre las barreras del contexto social y del sistema sanitario, se identificaron el conflicto con las expectativas del paciente, con las recomendaciones de otros especialistas, las características de los pacientes que consultan en Atención Primaria (AP) y la limitación de tiempo en las consultas. Como facilitadores se identificaron la motivación personal, los conocimientos y el modelo de práctica profesional del tutor y que las GPC fueran claras, breves y en diversos formatos.Conclusiones: los residentes dan valor a las GPC como herramientas docentes, de ayuda a la toma de decisiones y para desempeñar un mejor ejercicio profesional, aunque encuentran dificultades y limitaciones en su uso. El papel del tutor se identifica como clave; la formación, motivación y el modelo de práctica del tutor son considerados como los mayores facilitadores.(AU)

Aim: to identify barriers and facilitators for the use of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) by Family and Community Medicine residents.Method: qualitative methodology. Three focus groups were set up, with a total of 28 participants, 3rd and 4th year residents of the 7 Multiprofessional Family and Community Care Teaching Units of Madrid. The topics explored were based on knowledge, understanding, usefulness and use of CPG. The categories chosen for discussion were drawn up according to the GuiaSalud Methodological Manual. Sociological analysis was performed using a phenomenological approach.Results: the barriers related to training were the training model received to acquire the necessary skills, the lack of knowledge to evaluate the quality of guidelines and a limited knowledge of the search engines. Among the barriers related to social context and health system, conflict with the patient's expectations or with the recommendations of other specialists, the characteristics of patients who consult in primary care and the limited time available for consultations were all identified. Personal motivation, the tutor’s knowledge and professional practice model and clear, brief CPGs and in various formats were all identified as facilitators. Conclusions: residents value CPGs as teaching and decision-making tools, as well as a tool to improve their professional practice. However, they detect difficulties and limitations in their use. Training, motivation and the tutor's practice model are considered to be among the greatest facilitators.(AU)

A survey of Canadian specialist anesthesiologists and family practice anesthetists: rural operating room use, a mixed model of care, and mentoring.

PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to collect data on the delivery of anesthesia in Canada. Specifically, our goal was to increase knowledge by identifying provider demographics and different models of anesthesia delivery, and to explore relationships among specialist anesthesiologists (SAs) and family practice anesthetists (FPAs) with a focus on mentoring. METHODS: An online questionnaire was circulated to SAs and FPAs holding membership with the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society or the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada. A total of 274/2,578 individuals completed the survey (170 SAs and 104 FPAs), providing a response rate of 10.6%. The survey included questions about demographics, anesthesia training, anesthesia resources, models of care, and mentoring relationships. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged from the data: 1) FPAs and rural operating rooms are underused resources as 65% (64/98) of FPAs reported having capacity to increase their individual volume of anesthesia services and 41% (40/98) thought capacity existed within their hospital to increase the volume of surgery; 2) 20 hospitals employed a mixed model of anesthesia care whereby SAs and FPAs worked collectively within the same site; providers working within this model reported high levels of satisfaction and independence; 3) most SAs and FPAs perceived a benefit to mentoring and were interested in participating in a mentoring program. CONCLUSION: This survey shows perceived capacity to expand surgical services in rural areas, a precedent for a mixed SA-FPA model of anesthesia delivery at the same site, and desire for anesthesia providers to engage in mentoring. Such options should be considered to strengthen the physician-led anesthesiology profession in Canada.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de ce projet était de recueillir des données sur la prestation de l'anesthésie au Canada. Plus précisément, notre objectif était d'accroître les connaissances en identifiant les caractéristiques démographiques des prestataires et les différents modèles de prestation d'anesthésie, et d'explorer les relations entre les anesthésiologistes spécialisé·es (AS) et les anesthésiologistes en médecine familiale (AMF) en mettant l'accent sur le mentorat. MéTHODE: Un questionnaire en ligne a été distribué aux AS et aux AMF membres avec la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes ou la Société de la médecine rurale du Canada. Au total, 274 personnes sur 2578 ont répondu à l'enquête (170 AS et 104 AMF), soit un taux de réponse de 10,6 %. L'enquête comprenait des questions sur les données démographiques, la formation en anesthésie, les ressources en anesthésie, les modèles de soins et les relations de mentorat. RéSULTATS: Trois grands thèmes se sont dégagés des données : 1) Les AMF et les salles d'opération en milieu rural sont des ressources sous-utilisées, puisque 65 % (64/98) des AMF ont déclaré avoir la capacité d'augmenter le volume individuel de leurs services d'anesthésie et 41 % (40/98) pensaient qu'il existait une capacité au sein de leur hôpital pour augmenter le volume chirurgical; 2) 20 hôpitaux utilisent un modèle mixte de soins d'anesthésie dans lequel les AS et les AMF travaillent collectivement sur le même site; les prestataires qui travaillent dans le cadre de ce modèle ont fait état de niveaux élevés de satisfaction et d'indépendance; 3) la plupart des AS et des AMF perçoivent un avantage au mentorat et sont intéressé·es à participer à un programme de mentorat. CONCLUSION: Cette enquête montre la capacité perçue d'étendre les services chirurgicaux dans les zones rurales, un précédent pour un modèle mixte AS-AMF de prestation d'anesthésie sur le même site, et le désir des prestataires d'anesthésie de s'engager dans le mentorat. De telles options devraient être envisagées pour renforcer la profession médicale de l'anesthésiologie au Canada.

[Evaluation of the Scientific Production in the Field of General Practice and Family Medicine in Portugal]. / Avaliação da Produção Científica na Área da Medicina Geral e Familiar em Portugal.

INTRODUCTION: The Portuguese publications in the field of General Practice and Family Medicine have not yet been assessed in bibliometric studies. The aim of this study was to analyze that production between 2012 and 2022. METHODS: The Web of Science Core Collection was used to gather the number of articles, journals and citations obtained; the Journal Citation Reports to obtain the Impact Factor and quartile of journals; and Scimago Journal & Country Rank, for the comparison of data with other European countries. The search was based on the following query: "usf OR unidade de Saude Familiar OR centro de Saude OR ACeS OR medicina geral familiar OR Gen Practice Family SAME Portugal", and a time window between 2012 and 2022 was defined. The study considered the following quantitative indicators: total number of publications, typology, language, affiliation, co-authors, geographical distribution, thematic areas, and the number of publications/inhabitant and publications/physician from European countries; the qualitative indicators selected were the Impact Factor (IF), the quartile and the number of citations. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2022, the national scientific production had an average annual growth rate of 36.6%. Of 389 publications, 73.8% were 'Articles' and 11.8% were 'Review Articles', predominantly in English (88.4%). The fields of 'General Internal Medicine' (24.7%) and 'Public Environmental Health' (14.9%) had the highest publication rates among the journals. The 389 publications received 5354 citations, for an average of 13.76 citations per article, and the average yearly citation growth was 115%. According to IF, 22.5% of the 222 journals belonged to Q4, 27.5% to Q3, 29.7% to Q2 and 20.3% to Q1, and therefore no significant bias regarding the journals where Portuguese doctors publish was observed. CONCLUSION: The bibliometric analysis allowed us to examine the evolution of the scientific production in the field of Portuguese General Practice and Family Medicine by observing an increasing publication trend and with a high potential for publication growth.

Introdução: As publicações portuguesas da área de Medicina Geral e Familiar ainda não foram alvo de estudos bibliométricos. Pretendeu-se analisar tal produção no período entre 2012 e 2022. Métodos: Usou-se a Web of Science Core Collection para obter o número de artigos, as revistas de publicação e as respetivas citações; o Journal Citation Reports para obter o Fator de Impacto e o quartil das revistas; e o Scimago Journal & Country Rank para a comparação de dados com outros países europeus. Utilizou-se a equação de pesquisa "usf OR unidade de Saude Familiar OR centro de Saude OR ACeS OR medicina geral familiar OR Gen Practice Family SAME Portugal", e selecionaram-se os resultados obtidos no período entre 2012 e 2022. Os indicadores quantitativos selecionados foram o total de publicações, tipologia, idioma, afiliação, coautorias, distribuição geográfica, áreas temáticas e o número de publicações/habitante e de publicações/médico em países europeus. Como indicadores qualitativos escolheu-se o Fator de Impacto (FI), o quartil das revistas e o número de citações. Resultados: Entre 2012 e 2022, a produção científica nacional teve uma taxa de crescimento médio anual de 36,6%. Em 389 publicações, 73,8% foram de 'Article' e 11,8% de 'Review Article', predominando a publicação em língua inglesa (88,4%). As revistas com maior publicação pertencem às áreas 'General Internal Medicine' (24,7%) e 'Public Environmental Health' (14,9%). As 389 publicações tiveram 5354 citações, com uma média de 13,76 citações por artigo e a taxa de crescimento médio anual de citações foi de 115%. Em função do FI, das 222 revistas, 22,5% pertenciam ao Q4, 27,5% ao Q3, 29,7% ao Q2 e 20,3% ao Q1, não se observando por isso nenhum viés assinalável relativamente às revistas onde os médicos portugueses publicam. Conclusão: A análise bibliométrica permitiu avaliar a evolução e o estado da produção científica da área da Medicina Geral e Familiar por investigadores portugueses, observando-se uma tendência de publicação crescente, e com forte potencial de crescimento.

Perfil e práticas dos médicos da atenção primária na pandemia de covid-19 em Salvador, Bahia, Brasil / The profile and practices of primary care physicians during the covid-19 pandemic in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil / Perfil y prácticas de los médicos de atención primaria en la pandemia de la covid-19 en Salvador, Bahía, Brasil

Em 2020, a atenção à saúde sofreu o impacto da pandemia de covid-19, e a Atenção Primária não foi exceção. Para melhor compreender a reorganização desse setor no município de Salvador, Bahia, esta pesquisa descreve o perfil dos médicos e as práticas de saúde realizadas por eles na Atenção Primária no contexto da pandemia. Trata-se de um estudo de corte transversal descritivo, que se utiliza de um questionário online autoaplicável distribuído aos médicos participantes que atuam nas unidades básicas de saúde que compõem a Atenção Primária do município. Para análise dos dados, foi utilizada estatística descritiva simples. Com um total de 43 questionários respondidos, foram descritos aspectos referentes a: perfil, formação e atuação dos médicos; mudanças estruturais ocorridas e adoção de novas ferramentas de trabalho; manutenção dos cuidados primários de rotina; ações de vigilância em saúde; suporte social a grupos vulneráveis; e atuação clínica em pacientes com covid-19. Com uma maioria de médicas jovens, recém-formadas e em um período curto de atuação nas equipes onde estavam inseridas, observou-se pouco envolvimento em vigilância e suporte a grupos vulneráveis e um abrangente uso de telemedicina e reestruturação do funcionamento das unidades. Contudo, alguns cuidados primários, como acompanhamento de doenças crônicas e puericultura, resultaram em limitações no acesso e, consequentemente, menor atenção ao cuidado longitudinal.

In 2020, health care suffered the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and primary care was no exception. To better understand the reorganization of this segment in the municipality of Salvador, Bahia, this research describes the profile of physicians and health practices performed by them in primary care in the pandemic context. This is a cross-sectional descriptive study using an online self-administered questionnaire distributed to participating physicians who work in the basic health units that are a part of primary care in the municipality. For data analysis, simple descriptive statistics was used. With a total of 43 questionnaires answered, the following aspects were described: profile, training, and performance of physicians; structural changes and adoption of new work tools; maintenance of routine primary care; health surveillance actions; social support to vulnerable groups; and clinical performance with COVID-19 patients. With mostly young females, recently graduated, and with a short period of service in the teams where they were located; little involvement in surveillance and support to vulnerable groups is observed, as well as an extensive use of telemedicine and restructuring of the operation of the units. However, some primary care, such as chronic disease follow-up and childcare, resulted in limitations in access and, consequently, less attention to longitudinal care.

En 2020, la atención sanitaria sufrió el impacto de la pandemia de la covid-19 y la atención primaria no fue la excepción. Para comprender mejor la reorganización de este sector en el municipio de Salvador, en Bahía (Brasil), esta investigación describe el perfil de los médicos y las prácticas de salud realizadas por ellos en la atención primaria en el contexto de la pandemia. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo transversal que utilizó un cuestionario autoadministrado en línea distribuido a los médicos participantes que trabajan en las Unidades Básicas de Salud que componen la atención primaria del municipio. Para el análisis de los datos, se utilizó estadística descriptiva simple. Con un total de 43 preguntas respondidas, se describieron aspectos referentes al perfil, formación y capacitación de los médicos; a los cambios estructurales ocurridos y adopción de nuevas herramientas de trabajo; al mantenimiento de los cuidados primarios de rutina; a las acciones de vigilancia en salud; al apoyo social a grupos vulnerables; y a la capacitación clínica en pacientes con covid-19. La mayoría de las médicas eran jóvenes, recién licenciadas y tenían un corto período de actuación en los equipos con los cuales trabajaban, se observó una escasa implicación en la vigilancia y apoyo a colectivos vulnerables, así como un amplio uso de la telemedicina y la reestructuración del funcionamiento de las unidades. Sin embargo, algunas atenciones primarias, como el seguimiento de enfermedades crónicas y la atención a la infancia, se tradujeron en limitaciones en el acceso y, en consecuencia, en menos atención al cuidado longitudinal.

Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective - a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patients' view on continuity of care (CoC), including preference for a certain general practitioner (GP) and importance and access to a regular general practitioner (RGP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care center in Halland County, in the western part of Sweden. SUBJECTS: Patients ≥18 years old and having at least one appointment at the primary care center during October-December 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preference for a certain GP and importance of and accessibility for an RGP. RESULTS: The study included 404 patients. Importance of having an RGP was considered by 86% of the patients. Preference for a certain GP was thought by 73% of the patients, and when asked as a bivariate question, 69% considered having an RGP. Both the importance of an RGP and preference for a certain GP were more often considered by patients ≥65 years (p < .0001). Regarding accessibility, 67% of the patients reported having access to their RGP 'always/most of the time or a lot of the time' and 62% reported seeing their RGP at last visit. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study showed that the majority of patients value CoC in terms of importance of having an RGP. Older patients were more likely to have a preference for a certain GP. Two-third of the patients succeeded in seeing their RGP always or a lot of the time. The results in this study provide evidence that CoC is important for most patients, regardless of age and gender.Key pointsPrevious studies have showed that continuity of care (CoC) is important regarding mortality and morbidity. In primary care, there is a current debate regarding CoC, accessibility and the strive for CoC. This study showed that the majority of patients, regardless of age and gender, value CoC and consider it being important. However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding age, where patients above 65 years old thought it was more important to have a regular general practitioner and more often had a preference for a certain GP.